Case Blog

RHI boiler owners granted leave to judicially review decision to publish names

The High Court granted leave to hundreds of Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) boiler owners to judicially review government plans to publish their names.

The RHI scheme was set up to encourage businesses and other non-domestic users to move from using fossil fuels to renewable heating schemes.  However, the contracts permitted users to financially profit from the schemes by enabling them to earn £1.60 for every £1 of fuel burned.  This led to many users burning fuel unnecessarily for the purpose of making a substantial profit.

Tags
Disclosure, Private Information & Data Protection

Facebook required to pay damages to flag protester about comments regarding the religion of his children

Tags
Private Information & Data Protection

Application for asylum not validly made can have no effect, says Supreme Court

Mirza and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 63

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the applicants’ judicial review of the Secretary of State’s decisions to treat a number of asylum applications as invalid.

Tags
Immigration & Asylum

NI Attorney-General cannot refer Ashers case to the Supreme Court

Gareth Lee v Colin McArthur, Karen McArthur and Ashers Baking Company Ltd [2016] NICA 55

In our October Update, we reported that on 24th October 2016, the Court of Appeal found that Ashers Baking Company had directly discriminated against the respondent on grounds of sexual orientation, and religious and political belief, by refusing to fulfil his order for a cake in support of marriage equality.

Tags
Discrimination, LGBT

Bereaved cohabitees not entitled to spousal bereavement benefits even if they had children

An Application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review [2016] NICA 53

In our March 2016 update, we reported that the High Court had found that the denial of bereavement benefits to a mother on the ground she was not married to her partner at his date of death, and where children were impacted, was unlawful.  The DSD appealed this decision and the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.

Tags
Family Law, Social Security

The PILS Project
Community House | City Link Business Park | 6A Albert Street | Belfast BT12 4HQ
Tel 028 9099 4258 | info@pilsni.org